Forgive me for delaying Part 2 in Allah’s True Identity; I promise I will post my video on the Persians soon.
In the meantime, I’d like to begin this article as Greek Philosophers did their lectures: with a question. What if Infidels were easier to kill?
It’s not hard to imagine such a scenario. With the recent horrific shooting in Florida, gun control is on many American’s minds. And with those beautifully organized protests, how could we not think of the children?
Some say we should have mental health screenings, but what would qualify someone as being mentally Ill? Would we use the standards of someone like Joy Behar who equates Christianity with mental illness?
Perhaps a trained psychiatrist would do…unfortunately, a trained psychiatrist also did this in 2009:
To this day, Nidal Hassan, a trained army psychiatrist who committed jihad in the name of Allah against a group of unarmed soldiers in what is essentially a 30.06 zone, sits on death row. This “Soldier of Allah” as he called himself, demonstrated a fine example of what could happen if Infidels were easier to kill. These Infidels were unarmed because they were on Fort Hood; their names in stone are testimony to this fact.
Perhaps if we just give up our weapons our children would be safer….
A beautiful thought, but most schools are 30.06 zones, meaning it is unlawful to carry an otherwise legal concealed or even open carry weapon onto the premises. Criminals who did not follow this posted 30.06 zone are unlikely to hand in their weapons just because we ask them nicely to.
The idea of giving up our guns and the violence with it sounds nice in theory, but lies often do have a flowery ring to them. That is why they are lies, and that is why people believe them.
I’m not here to argue necessarily for or against stricter gun laws or special training or even psychiatric tests for gun ownership. What I am here to do is challenge you all to slow down for a moment and think like the enemy. In doing so, it is my hope to provide another dimension to this debate and make Americans think deeply about first and second order effects. Why? Because whether we want to admit it or not, the enemy is watching us. And they are watching us rip ourselves apart over the very American and time honored tradition of gun ownership in this country.
Infidels, this simply should not be. So instead of arguing with each other, let’s study this as the enemies of freedom would study it, as the enemy is studying us right now. Do you know what does the radical jihadist doctrine say about kafirs (non muslims) and guns?
There is no equal protection under Sharia for different classes of people. Justice is dualistic, with one set of laws for Muslim males and different laws for women and non Muslims. A non muslim cannot bear arms (Warner 2014)
As most are aware, the US constitution demands the opposite, that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. This is regardless of religion.
Why would there be a prohibition on Infidels in a Sharia society owning weapons? The only reason that I can think of is the following: If the Infidels are unarmed, then they cannot fight back. This gives the enemy a lot more leeway with which to strike and destroy an otherwise hard to kill population.
The Army trained my companions and I in basic infantry drills. During such drills we utilized other resources to make missions more successful. We incorporated tanks, air bombers, and other such things to ensure an easier victory.
One of my favorite and most well practiced exercises was the “call for fire scenario”. You radioed to the field artillery personnel and had them bomb the target prior to your assault, in order to “soften” it.
Jihadists may not have field artillery as an organized entity, but they do have the jihad of speech. What if the enemy was “softening” us right now, not with artillery or tanks or planes, but with ideas?
With an unarmed US population, the Kafirs would be shot like fish in a barrel and subjugated like donkeys in a pen.
I am not saying that this most recent shooting is some grand plot by the jihadists. I believe, as most do, that this extremely troubled young man acted alone for many reasons, but is worth mentioning that the Florida shooter was an admirer of Isis.
Again, I am not against some restrictions on weapons or even psychiatric screening. I am only advising extreme caution moving forward.
If the second amendment is banned or even too restricted, we will be one step closer to Sharia Law and all the more vulnerable. That is not all right with THIS Infidel.
It shouldn’t be OK with you either.
Daniels, K (2018) Reported Florida Shooter Discussed “Allahu Akbar” on Instagram. Infowars. Profilehttps://www.infowars.com/report-florida-shooter-inspired-by-isis-allahu-akbar/
Shadow, 2015. “Failure to improve ‘gun control’ distressing”… President Obama interview with BBC http://funtobebad.blogspot.com/2015/07/failure-to-improve-gun-control.html